Monday 24 November 2014

Project 10 Research Part 2: Animal Print in fashion and Design

Brief history of Animal Print:

Unless other trends, which come and go within the fast rotating fashion seasons, the “animal print” a firm fashion stable. Its use is widespread from clothes to wallpaper, shoes to dinning plates, from lingerie to stationary. Famous fashion houses like Versace, Prada, Dior, Dolce and Gabana, use animal print regularly in their collections.


Looking back in history the wearing of animal skin was a necessity for warmth and protection. Over time it developed as a symbol that represent wealth, and social status. Animal skin and fur like leopard, cheetah, leather from snake or crocodile are expensive and exotic materials, which can only be afforded by, privileged few. Kings, religious leaders, wore and use animal skin to demonstrate their power.

In 20th century high fashion designers working for Hollywood stars and high society associated animal with glamour (and sex appeal). From 1920s you could see actresses and pin up models wearing animal print; Scarlet Nixon, Bettie Page, Elizabeth Taylor, to name a few. In 1947 Christian Dior introduced a leopard print dress for the first time. He used this print in his collections regularly associating it with “sophistication” and “elegance”. So much so that American first lady Jackie Kennedy wore an animal print coat in 1950s. 1960s and 1970s both hippy and punk rock movement used animal print in more colour, correlating it with wild, daring, adventurous vibe of the these cultural movements. 1980s and 1990s it was a part of power dressing. In 2000s and 2010s its use has spread significantly. Animal print is now associated with qualities like sexy, chic, fun, dangerous, elegant, adventurous, primal, and powerful.

Left Betty Page, Centre Dior 1947 Dress, right Jackie Kennedy


Popular use of the animal print and its application to various products increased over the decades thanks to of the modern textile techniques.  Nowadays animal print and its texture qualities can be re-produced without animals suffering. Use of real fur and leather from exotic animals is becoming a rare practice and rightly so.
Versage Scarf
There are several suggestions regarding psychology behind the wearing animal print. One is that wearing animal print connects us to our primal past to our “inner caveman”. it is also suggested that animal print increase attractiveness because fear response increase “looking time”. Generally it is believed that the characteristic of the animal (like fieriness of tiger) is transferred to the wearer.

Over the years many fashion designers harnessed the power of animal print updated its use and gave it a new lease of life. Among many I was attracted to two in particular: Rudi Gernreich, and Alexander Mc Queen, both I thought were revolutionary designers.


Rudi Gernreich (1922-1985): Austrian born American an iconic fashion designer. Gernreich was one of the most influential designers who defined “the new woman” in 1960s. He designed for relaxed comfortable clothes embracing the body in motion. He used synthetic materials, jersey, introduced knitted swimsuit and no-bra. His woman was androgynous yet adventures and risk taking. I think he really wanted to challenge the “look” of the era and produced very confident designs with geometric patterns, sharp cuts, daring swimsuits, uncommon color combinations, mixed materials.  
Gernreich made a collection of animal patterned outfits (Dalmatian, giraffe, tiger skin), with matching tights and underwear in 1968. His use of animal print is more courageous and he helped to re-enforce the popular pattern’s rein in fashion, but this time for the cool, young and new woman.
Rudi Fernreich Animal Print outfits


Alexander McQueen (1969 – 2010): McQueen is described as the wild child of couture who put British fashion on the map in 2000s. His work is shocking, edgy, disturbing in some places and rebellious. He is known for his long, big budgeted and theatrical fashion shows.

Coming from a modest London family, he learned tailoring at Saville Road, worked for a theatre costume company Angels and Studied Fashion MA at St Martins. He was discovered by an aristocrat fashion editor Isabella Blow, who later helped him to establish himself in the fashion world. His early collections and shows have been heavily criticized for being misogamist and (e.g. Highland Rape Collection). 



My feminist bones don’t agree with his earlier shows either; but I recognize his skill as an excellent technician who dares to sabotage the tradition. He uses animal prints and birds as inspiration regularly. He cuts unusually defying convention (bumpster trousers). Isabella Blow in one interview said “He is a wild bird with a good silhouette”. He had a dark, wild side and expressed it in his design. V&A will be showing his collections this spring (2015) in an exhibition called “Savage Beauty”, a fitting tribute.

McQueen’s relationship with fashion world has been rocky but fruitful. He worked for big fashion houses Givency and Gucci and founded his own label. He won four British Designer of the year awards and a CBE. But ended his life unexpectedly in 2010 after his final show Plato’s Atlantis. It is this collection caught my attention.

In Plato’s Atlantis Mcquen uses animal print very differently. Usually animal prints are used true to the original pattern and colour. We see them as mono-prints as a re-production of the original and are used as uniform patterns on a garment.





McQueen on the other hand uses many colours. He puts reptile and insect prints from different part of animal together (some animals like crocodile have different patterns on abdomen, arms and back of animal). And he puts different animal prints together (snake with crocodile), making a kaleidoscope of animal pattern. He creates and explosion of color. He places patterns strategically to emphasize belly, skirt, bust or bottom. All in place to define the form and cut of the garment. I though this created balance among all the busy patterns. Some designs mimic bones and skull adding to wild and danger element. Yet I could make out a flower or two too. Some materials he use moves (I am guessing silk) some are solid keeping the form. It creates a fell that this particular pattern is designed for this particular garment. Not a pattern on fabric for multiple uses. It is an exquisite craftsmanship and I guess that’s why he is celebrated so much.

Researching his life and work was curious providing insight to fashion industry, how demanding, fast and ruthless industry it is. McQueen was producing 10 shows a year, and despite his entire attitude he was vulnerable subject to relentless expectation and criticism. I will make an effort to see his retrospective at V&A this spring.


Documentary 'McQuuen and I': https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNK2mKT8n9o

BBC Documentary 'The Works' - Alexander McQueen 'Cutting Up Rough' 1997: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=542vMeyma4g

Notes to myself:

The concept of identity is big and wide and ever evolving changing, shifting subject. The use of animal print is an example of how we communicate our personality via borrowed image and its associations.

After all the artists and designers I looked into, how can I incorporate this knowledge into my design? I am afraid to simplify and reduce the theoretical and historical research I conducted. But I need to write some bullet points to get me started.

  • Identity is an ongoing process. Our visual interpretations change with it too. Portrait becomes a common medium to express identity visually. Feminists employ this strategy by putting themselves in the work making it a self-portrait. One can use this strategy by doing a tapestry. But I cannot really easily use this approach in a pattern. Therefore I plan to incorporate concepts associated with identity into the structure of the cloth. For example:
  •  vulnerable and sturdy: lace-like structure vs manipulated and raised surface (smocking, machine embroidery)
  • feels constant but evolving: (a background color – contrasted by bust of other colors but in smaller amounts)
  • using a varied versions of same pattern
  • ever changing: multi-use object to or a carry-able
  • layered: layers with embroidery and fabric manipulation

There is no point of re-producing well-used and well-known animal prints like, leopard, tiger, and cheetah. McQueen research has been a good lesson to see what you can do with a print.

At the moment I am inspired by reptile skin particularly iguana skin. It has different shapes and colors. I am at the early stages of my development

Next Step: Get sketching. Start making samples.

Project 10 - Research Part 1: Identity: Work in progress

Project 10: Research

For the final project my visual stimulus comes from skin, animal skin, which provides an array of pattern, texture and color combinations. Skin on the other hand has direct reference to our identity. Hence our body/skin is often used as a medium where we practice who we are. Our skin color, social status, class, nationality, gender, religion, family, all the way down to what we choose to wear define who we are. Being used as a metaphor for skin, textiles can become an important tool to express identity. Keeping all these in mind, I divide my research into two categories:
  • First a theoretical analysis: An investigation of artists who worked with the concept of identity: how they discuss, articulate and represent identity.
  • Second a more practical analysis: The historical and contemporary use of animal skin in design and fashion. Here my objective is to observe the design practices and in which context designers used animal print. 
Research Part 1: Identity: Work in progress:

August Sandler (1876-1964)I’d like to start with photographer August Sandler  and his People of 20th Century body of work in which Sandler photographed German people from all walks of life. This work from 1910s to 1930s is published in a book called “Faces of our Time” (1929). His portraits of ordinary people didn’t agree well with Nazi regime’s ideal Aryan type and his book is banned and many of prints destroyed.

I chose Sandler because his portraits show the rigid boundaries of identity of the people living in early 20th century: workers, farmers, artists, housewives, clergy, doctor etc. You can see who is who from these portraits and the hierarchy among them becomes clear. 

August Sandler People of 20th Century 

At the turn of the century documentary photography had a claim of being “real” and hence exposed truth. Today we have a more cynical view about it. Nevertheless photography played a crucial role to explore and define our identities. Sandler’s work is one of the first examples of this practice.


Cindy Sherman (b.1954)Cindy Sherman is one of my favourite women photographers. She is a contemporary photographer who question how our (gender) identities are constructed and congealed via images we consume through mass media, art and cinema. Sherman uses the portrait tradition often. Photographing herself as the subject she re-creates the well-known iconic images/scenes within our cultural collective memory. By doing so she not only underlines the stereotypical identities woman are affiliated to, but also unbalances the power between the photographer/director/artist and its subject. 
Cindy Sherman - Film Stills Untitled No21
Cindy Sherman - Film Stills Untitled No92
Cindy Sherman - Art History Series
Sherman challenges the very idea that Sandler would have believed; that photographic representation was the truth. She like many of her contemporaries argued that representation (through art, cinema, photography) is a construction and challenged its very nature. Nan Goldin is another interesting woman photographer using photography to document her life and her social circle exposing identities change constantly.


Cindy Sherman Untitled Series continued

Grayson Perry: “Our most beautiful and complex artwork we can make is our own identity”:

Grayson Perry is a well-known British artist who often films his projects and process of working. I was very interested in his 2012 “All in the Best Possible Taste” series for Channel 4, in which he argued that our socioeconomic environment and our class determine our aesthetic taste. Spending time with various families, observing objects and décor of their home, and their life, he produced a series of large tapestry pieces. 

His new Channel 4 series “Who Are You?” looks closer to the individual. I both watched the series and went to the exhibition at National Portrait Gallery. In his exhibition leaflet he says: “Our sense of self feels constant but our identity is an ongoing performance that is changed and adapted by our experiences and circumstances”. 

Perry chose individuals who are somewhat at crossroads going through a period that re-evaluates their identity: change of gender, fame, status, religion, disability and health. He looks at alliances with our family, nation, religion, or groups. He spent time with his subjects: a fallen from grace politician Chris Huhne, TV celebrity Rylan Clark, Mother of 5 Islam convert Kayleigh, sex changing teenager Alexandre.. all of whose story is awe-inspiring. Although he argues that he is snapshotting their ‘own’ narrative of ‘who they are’; he also positions them into his ironic but emphatic narrative.
Grayson Perry: The Huhne Vase
Grayson Perry: Jesus Army Money Box
Throughout the documentary identity is argued as:
  • Fragmented pieces linked together in complex ways
  • Layered (past - present, old – new, born into - chosen)
  • Linked to the people we love and trust (that’s why when we lose someone we love, we feel like we lost a part of ourselves)
  • Looking for something certain. This certainty anchors and comforts
  • Reinventing (finding new groups, new alliances when existing ones don’t fit)
  • An ongoing process.. (and hence flexible)
  • As Grayson puts himself: “it is a never ending negotiation between loyalties we inherit and the ones we chose”
Perry is not a stranger to identity questions. A cross-dresser himself he uses and performs his alter ego within his artwork all the time. It is interesting to watch him starting with an idea, observing his subjects, sketching them and then turning them into a visual narrative and final work. For example he produced a silk scarf for a Muslim convert Kayleigh, an jolly pinky flag like embroidered piece (contrast to militarist graphic language decorates the streets of Ireland) representing an Irish unionist group, a vase to represent fading memories of an Alzheimer’s patient, a heroic statue for a sex changing teenager, a screen printed poster announcing Deafness is not a disability but a way of living...
Grayson Perry: The Ashford Hijab
Grayson Perry: Britain is Best
Within his Channel4 show, it was curious to watch how he interprets these identities and puts them into the context both he observes and defines at the same time. The results are thought provoking and siting pretty out of space among all well-established portraits and sculptures of the National Portrait Gallery.

Perry works with old techniques like pottery, textiles, tapestry and he uses them very provocatively. I think Perry’s success in today’s art scene is  a result of him employing these overlooked techniques to examine the challenging contemporary issues.


Louise Bourgeois: An archeology of oneself as an existentialist exercise

Louise Bourgeois (1911-2010) was an influential French American artist who worked with variety of materials (textiles, sculpture, print and drawing) and provided us with a thought-provoking body of work, confronting gender identities through exploration of her own psyche. Her main source of inspiration was her own life, mainly childhood. She constantly exposed painful memories of her childhood and adolescence within her art. Although this process can be dismissed being autobiographical, it refers to a more universal status of human experience; reaching deep into her own psyche; she taps into ours as well.
 
Louise Bourgeois
Her work exploring sexuality, anxiety, rejection, love, resentment doesn’t provide a comfortable viewing. When my tutor suggested I research Bourgeois, I remember seeing her phallic sculptures at a university trip to The Pompidou Centre in Paris (2001, Media Studies Solent University). At the time I though her work will add to the “angry feminist” stereotype. (Although I remember thinking her work is doing a great service by bringing phallus back into visual cultural circulation hence it has been castrated from public domain since ancient Greek times. Same can be said for Grayson Perry).

Bourgeois is not interested in making us comfy. “I really want to worry people, to bother people,’’ she told The Washington Post in 1984. “They say they are bothered by the double genitalia in my new work. Well, I have been bothered by it my whole life”.
 
Louise Bourgeois: Janus fleuri 1968
She is exposing issues pushed down under female psyche by social convention, motherhood, sex, body image, etc. She is honest and daring enough to bare it all, making art that comes from emotions, processing them and giving them a form. I find that her choice of sculpture as a medium is telling; as if she wants to give these emotions a “body”, a physical existence. In a documentary about her work she says “In order to liberate myself from the past I have to reconstruct it, make a statue out of it and get rid of it through making sculpture”. (Tracey Emin on Louise Bourgeois: Women Without Secrets - Secret Knowledge)
Louise Bourgeois: Spiral Women 2003
Bourgeois was unknown until she was in her 70s (maybe there is still hope for us too:-). NewYork Museum of Modern Art presented a retrospective exhibition of her work in 1982. From then she exhibited widely and renounced as a very influential feminist artist.

I have visited Tate Modern this weekend to see her works on paper. I found her drawings from her memory very expressive and but surprisingly soft. The childbirth and motherhood series, ink on wet paper, are both harsh and kind at the same time. The images are gentle but color red breaks its softness. We think motherhood as life giving; a great connection but Bourgeois images also communicates its ambiguities and difficulty. 
Louise Bourgeois: The Family 2008
For a work about her hometown and her family where she created a series of table napkins: a great but unusual object to look back through. I thought only a woman could make that connection, many relationships are forged on a dinner table. The interlocking web-like big prints with organic lines, shapes are complex but not aggressive. And of course the drawings the spider. The Maman is her most famous work. I find it curious that she choses such an aggressive animal to represent motherhood. It resonates her personal childhood experience with her nanny who became his father’s mistress. It makes me think that maybe motherhood can be a potent act; hence nurturing can be a both tender and aggressive.
 
Louise Bourgeois: Embroidered Spider (Not in Tate exhibition) 
Louise Bourgeois: My Inner Life 2008
Bourgeois is an enigmatic artist. I admire her honesty and her integrity. I enjoyed the fact that she used textile techniques and embroidery in her work widely. She proves that it takes a great courage to be true to yourself.


One can also mention Tracy Emin, a well-known contemporary British artist questioning gender identities through exposing her life experiences in her work. Like Bourgeois, Emin uses textiles often and in her latest exhibition at White cube she used embroidered sketches of her own body on big canvases. 


Extras: On my visit to Tate Modern, I also seen Richard Tuttle placed an installation in Tate’s turbine hall. It is a part of the work called : I Don’t Know: The Weave of Textile Language. The other part is an exhibition at Whitechapel Gallery. Approaching the enormous sculpture from upstairs, I was a little disappointed, because I felt the fabric presence was minimal and I didn’t understand why it didn’t cover the structure. It felt unfinished.  Looking it from below, feeling like an ant, I realised that he used fabrics to create forms and shadows which adds fluidity to otherwise sturdy structure. Working with fabric at this magnitude must be challenging. It is about colour, shape and space rather then print, or pattern.

Richard Turtle: tate Modern Turbine Hall Installation, I don't Know the Weave of Textile Langauge



I have also seen Tate collection Energy and Process: within which I spotted several artists who worked with textiles:
Nicolas Hlobo: (Macaleni Lintozomlambo 2010)
Anetta Messengers The Pikes Installation 1992-3
Geta Bratescu’s works Medeic Callisthenic Moves 1980
All these works are great examples of how contemporary artist use and work with textile as a medium.   

Sigmar Polke retrospective: Polke is very experimental artist. Throughout his career he constantly challenged visual and political orthodoxies of the world. Walking around the exhibition I felt his passion, hard work, and obsession with color and scale. Some canvases were huge and have a presence you cannot bypass. I specifically liked the paintings in which he used shop-bought fabrics instead of white canvases. What stroked me the most is that you wouldn’t realize the difference, that he worked the pattern fabric so well into the background; it became a part of painting. Finally the way he used polka dots mimicking commercial prints of post war era is inspiring. They have a unique aesthetic quality and beauty.
Sigmar Polke: Alice in Wonderland 1972

One can lost in the research. I surely enjoyed the visual feast and the challenging approaches the artists portrayed. Next task it to start developing my ideas and design.